Wyoming: Attorney & Judicial Discipline

Who regulates lawyers and judges in Wyoming, how complaints are filed, counted, and adjudicated, and where the complaint and disposition numbers come from.

Attorney discipline

Who regulates lawyers in Wyoming No published statistics

Attorney discipline in Wyoming is administered by the Wyoming State Bar, Office of Bar Counsel (Board of Professional Responsibility), under the ultimate authority of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

117
complaints received (2023)
4
lawyers publicly disciplined (2023)
1,779
active lawyers (2023)
2.248
publicly disciplined per 1,000 lawyers

About -242.0% of complaints proceed past initial screening (2023); the rest are screened out or dismissed.

How complaints are filed

A complaint (often called a grievance) against a lawyer is filed directly with the Wyoming State Bar, Office of Bar Counsel (Board of Professional Responsibility), typically via an online or printable complaint form. Filing is free and no lawyer is needed. The agency screens each filing to confirm it involves an attorney under its jurisdiction and conduct that could violate the rules of professional conduct; filings that survive screening are opened for investigation. The disciplinary process addresses professional misconduct — it cannot overturn a case result or award damages.

How complaints are counted

This state publishes no aggregate attorney discipline statistics of its own. No aggregate annual statistics report found. Where Vitreo shows figures for this jurisdiction, gaps are filled from the ABA Survey on Lawyer Discipline Systems (S.O.L.D.), the annual national survey — clearly flagged in our dataset.

How complaints are adjudicated

Wyoming follows the standard three-stage model used across U.S. jurisdictions: disciplinary counsel screens and investigates; where warranted, formal charges are heard by a hearing panel or disciplinary board, which recommends a sanction; and final authority over public discipline — disbarment, suspension, public censure or reprimand — rests with the Wyoming Supreme Court. Lesser private discipline (admonitions) may issue below the court level and never becomes public. Exact panel composition, deadlines, and appeal rights are set by the jurisdiction's disciplinary rules.

YearComplaints receivedPublicly disciplined
20181507
20191616
20201147
20211284
20221173
20231174

Judicial discipline

Who regulates judges in Wyoming Partial statistics

Complaints against Wyoming state judges are handled by the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics. (Federal judges sitting in Wyoming are covered by the separate federal system.)

37
complaints against judges (2022)

How complaints are filed

Complaints about Wyoming judges are filed in writing with the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics. Filing is free and confidential. The commission's jurisdiction covers judicial conduct — bias, demeanor, conflicts, delay, abuse of office — not the legal correctness of rulings, which must be challenged on appeal. Complaints are screened confidentially, and most are dismissed at that stage.

How complaints are counted

Aggregate statistics are only partially published. Available metrics: reports exist (google drive hosted; content not extracted). Format: Annual-report PDF (Drive); coverage: 2021–2025. Drive-hosted PDFs not directly verified.

How complaints are adjudicated

If screening indicates possible misconduct, the commission investigates and may file formal charges heard in a formal proceeding. In most states the commission's role ends in a recommendation, with final public discipline — censure, suspension, or removal — imposed by the state's highest court; in some, the commission itself imposes sanctions subject to review. Wyoming's exact division of authority is set by its constitution and court rules. Confidential dispositions (private cautions or advisory letters) never become public.

YearComplaints receivedInvestigations opened
20223718

Sources

Where these numbers come from

Process descriptions summarize each jurisdiction's published rules in outline; details change and vary. Verify current procedure with the agency before filing. Vitreo is not a court or disciplinary authority, and nothing here is legal advice. Figures are drawn from each agency's own publications (and, where flagged, the ABA S.O.L.D. survey) — see The Evidence for methodology. Spotted an error or newer data? Tell us.