Maryland: Attorney & Judicial Discipline
Who regulates lawyers and judges in Maryland, how complaints are filed, counted, and adjudicated, and where the complaint and disposition numbers come from.
Attorney discipline
Who regulates lawyers in Maryland Publishes statistics
Attorney discipline in Maryland is administered by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland / Office of Bar Counsel, under the ultimate authority of the Supreme Court of Maryland.
About -127.0% of complaints proceed past initial screening (2025); the rest are screened out or dismissed.
How complaints are filed
A complaint (often called a grievance) against a lawyer is filed directly with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland / Office of Bar Counsel, typically via an online or printable complaint form. Filing is free and no lawyer is needed. The agency screens each filing to confirm it involves an attorney under its jurisdiction and conduct that could violate the rules of professional conduct; filings that survive screening are opened for investigation. The disciplinary process addresses professional misconduct — it cannot overturn a case result or award damages.
How complaints are counted
This state publishes aggregate attorney discipline statistics — files opened, matters docketed, disbarments, suspensions, reprimands, sanctioned attorneys, complaints by county/practice area. Published as: Annual-report PDF; coverage: ~FY2017–FY2025. Verified.
How complaints are adjudicated
Maryland follows the standard three-stage model used across U.S. jurisdictions: disciplinary counsel screens and investigates; where warranted, formal charges are heard by a hearing panel or disciplinary board, which recommends a sanction; and final authority over public discipline — disbarment, suspension, public censure or reprimand — rests with the Supreme Court of Maryland. Lesser private discipline (admonitions) may issue below the court level and never becomes public. Exact panel composition, deadlines, and appeal rights are set by the jurisdiction's disciplinary rules.
| Year | Complaints received | Investigations opened | Disbarments | Public suspensions | Public reprimands censures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1,599 | 285 | 28 | 16 | 32 |
| 2021 | 1,433 | 196 | 21 | 30 | 28 |
| 2022 | 1,589 | 303 | 19 | 25 | 33 |
| 2023 | 1,614 | 165 | 13 | 14 | 37 |
| 2024 | 1,696 | 152 | 6 | 17 | 14 |
| 2025 | 1,760 | 210 | 12 | 9 | 13 |
Judicial discipline
Who regulates judges in Maryland Publishes statistics
Complaints against Maryland state judges are handled by the Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities. (Federal judges sitting in Maryland are covered by the separate federal system.)
How complaints are filed
Complaints about Maryland judges are filed in writing with the Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities. Filing is free and confidential. The commission's jurisdiction covers judicial conduct — bias, demeanor, conflicts, delay, abuse of office — not the legal correctness of rulings, which must be challenged on appeal. Complaints are screened confidentially, and most are dismissed at that stage.
How complaints are counted
This state publishes aggregate judicial discipline statistics — verified complaints opened/processed, dispositions, sanctions/recommendations. Published as: Annual-report PDF; coverage: ~FY2024–FY2025. Verified.
How complaints are adjudicated
If screening indicates possible misconduct, the commission investigates and may file formal charges heard in a formal proceeding. In most states the commission's role ends in a recommendation, with final public discipline — censure, suspension, or removal — imposed by the state's highest court; in some, the commission itself imposes sanctions subject to review. Maryland's exact division of authority is set by its constitution and court rules. Confidential dispositions (private cautions or advisory letters) never become public.
| Year | Complaints received | Formal complaints filed | Censures reprimands admonishments | Removals | Resigned retired under agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 204 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 196 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 187 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 296 | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 336 | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| 2024 | 396 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 |
Sources
Where these numbers come from
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland / Office of Bar Counsel — attorney discipline statistics
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland / Office of Bar Counsel — main site
- Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities — judicial discipline statistics / annual reports
- ABA Survey on Lawyer Discipline Systems (S.O.L.D.)
- NCSC Center for Judicial Ethics — annual state judicial-discipline reviews