Illinois: Attorney & Judicial Discipline

Who regulates lawyers and judges in Illinois, how complaints are filed, counted, and adjudicated, and where the complaint and disposition numbers come from.

Attorney discipline

Who regulates lawyers in Illinois Publishes statistics

Attorney discipline in Illinois is administered by the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), IL Supreme Court, under the ultimate authority of the Illinois Supreme Court.

4,706
complaints received (2024)
60
lawyers publicly disciplined (2024)
62,093
active lawyers (2024)
0.966
publicly disciplined per 1,000 lawyers

About -27.0% of complaints proceed past initial screening (2024); the rest are screened out or dismissed.

How complaints are filed

A complaint (often called a grievance) against a lawyer is filed directly with the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), IL Supreme Court, typically via an online or printable complaint form. Filing is free and no lawyer is needed. The agency screens each filing to confirm it involves an attorney under its jurisdiction and conduct that could violate the rules of professional conduct; filings that survive screening are opened for investigation. The disciplinary process addresses professional misconduct — it cannot overturn a case result or award damages.

How complaints are counted

This state publishes aggregate attorney discipline statistics — requests for investigation, lawyers complained about, formal complaints, disbarments, suspensions, censures, reprimands, client protection payouts. Published as: Annual-report PDF + Highlights; coverage: current + multi-year archive. Robust; calendar-year.

How complaints are adjudicated

The Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), an arm of the Illinois Supreme Court, handles the full pipeline: staff counsel investigate; the Inquiry Board decides whether to file charges; the Hearing Board tries them; the Review Board hears appeals; and the Illinois Supreme Court imposes final discipline.

YearActive lawyersComplaints receivedPublicly disciplinedDisbarmentsPublic suspensions
201994,6624,93795——
202094,9073,93681——
202195,4803,881831662
202295,7114,359631236
202396,4404,575662137
202496,8214,706601729

Judicial discipline

Who regulates judges in Illinois Partial statistics

Complaints against Illinois state judges are handled by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board (JIB); tried by Illinois Courts Commission. (Federal judges sitting in Illinois are covered by the separate federal system.)

556
complaints against judges (2024)

How complaints are filed

Complaints about Illinois judges are filed in writing with the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board (JIB); tried by Illinois Courts Commission. Filing is free and confidential. The commission's jurisdiction covers judicial conduct — bias, demeanor, conflicts, delay, abuse of office — not the legal correctness of rulings, which must be challenged on appeal. Complaints are screened confidentially, and most are dismissed at that stage.

How complaints are counted

Aggregate statistics are only partially published. Available metrics: complaints/requests received, investigations, complaints filed with courts commission, dispositions/removals. Format: Annual-report PDF; coverage: latest ~2024. Proceedings confidential except Courts Commission filings.

How complaints are adjudicated

If screening indicates possible misconduct, the commission investigates and may file formal charges heard in a formal proceeding. In most states the commission's role ends in a recommendation, with final public discipline — censure, suspension, or removal — imposed by the state's highest court; in some, the commission itself imposes sanctions subject to review. Illinois's exact division of authority is set by its constitution and court rules. Confidential dispositions (private cautions or advisory letters) never become public.

YearComplaints received
2019609
2020404
2021604
2022499
2023527
2024556

Sources

Where these numbers come from

Process descriptions summarize each jurisdiction's published rules in outline; details change and vary. Verify current procedure with the agency before filing. Vitreo is not a court or disciplinary authority, and nothing here is legal advice. Figures are drawn from each agency's own publications (and, where flagged, the ABA S.O.L.D. survey) — see The Evidence for methodology. Spotted an error or newer data? Tell us.